There could be a feature which would add "Consumables" section to ticket creation and editing where user could specify what consumables were used and how much.

bonjour
Je souhaite personnaliser l’interface GLPI afin d’ajouter un champ supplémentaire dans la description des demandes et des incidents.
Ce champ devra indiquer le nom du rédacteur du ticket, c’est-à-dire la personne qui saisit directement la demande.

Cette modification doit être déployée uniquement sur un poste précis : une borne dédiée à la création de tickets GLPI.
Ce poste est un RaspberryPi fonctionnant sous Linux et héberge une instance locale de GLPI.

L’objectif est que, sur cette borne, lors de la création d’un ticket, l’utilisateur puisse saisir son nom dans un champ distinct (ou que ce nom soit automatiquement renseigné selon la configuration). Cette information devra être visible dans la description du ticket.

Pour cela, il faudra :

Ajouter un champ personnalisé (texte libre ou liste déroulante) dans l’interface de création de tickets.

Configurer GLPI afin que ce champ n’apparaisse que sur l’instance locale installée sur le RaspberryPi, sans modifier l’interface principale utilisée ailleurs.

Intégrer ce champ dans l’affichage des tickets (demandes et incidents) pour qu’il soit clairement consultable lors du suivi.

Hello, we use GLPI among other things for ticket management; users do not always think to validate solutions to close a ticket and thus trigger the satisfaction survey. I have therefore implemented automatic closure after a delay of 7 days in 'resolved' status, but for analysis purposes and for the company's statistics, we would like to ensure that when the automatic closure occurs, the satisfaction survey is also automatically validated at its maximum score (we assume that if there are no news, then the user is satisfied?). I suspect this must be complicated, and unfortunately, I do not have the necessary skills or knowledge for development... so I am launching the idea if you find it relevant or if others are looking for this as well :) Thank you for everything you do to make this software an efficient tool. Best regards, Dominique.

I just tried the 11 beta and I saw the new tools for editing text. 
It's better than before, but being used to writing Markdown on the go, this gives me the FosWiki vibes.
- I also tried to convert Markdown to HTML but even there, code block won't follow for example.

Proxmox implemented this a couple versions ago:
Simply writing this:
## Simple markdown heading
### This is so easy and effective

- Ok now a bullet list
- Easy again

```
Code block
```
Gives this 

It could be very nice to at least toggle a markdown mode for writing then display the "View mode" in html like GLPI does.... There's a project called Perlite that perfectly fits markdown pages to a static website :https://github.com/secure-77/Perlite

Then we could make documentation flow as we link with actual cases, hardware, tickets etc, without lifting our mouse so often....

Thank you

Hello! As the title states, I would like to formally request the following feature :

Add a button to the following location for users with the Super-Admin rights :
The button should be here : Administration > GLPI Version Panel > Update to latest GLPI Version.

The reason I am requesting this is to have a reduced risk of botching something up.

The GLPI agent is capable of collecting and sending information about the active firewalls on the computer; however, GLPI does not make use of this data. It would be nice if this information were reflected in the computer asset.

Example:

Windows:

"firewalls": [
{
"profile": "DomainProfile",
"status": "on"
},
{
"profile": "PublicProfile",
"status": "on"
},
{
"profile": "StandardProfile",
"status": "on"
}
],

Linux:

"firewalls": [
{
"description": "ufw",
"status": "on"
}

It occurred to me to be able to filter the modules returned by the global search.

For example, when we search for a ticket in the global search, it returns data from other modules, related to the keyword we mainly use.

Thanks

Regards

Hi,

Is it possible to integrate Bookstack Wiki in GLPI in replacement of the GLPI wiki ?

Thanks !

Hello, I think it would be a nice feature to have the option to allow watchers to chance ticket status when submiting a follow up via GLPI.

In my company sometime a ticket needs to have a green light of a third party (we've not yet fully implemented the approval module) or add relevant information to a ticket.

The way it works today is that if said user replies via e-mail GLPI will change the status back do processing but if they do via GLPI page, even if they uncheck the pending button, status won't change.

 Must have a Computers dashboard by operating system. 

"Computers by operating system"

W7, w10, w11, ubnt, redh....