Nice project manager in 0.90.1, but non tree view and this bad...
Subprojects in all list view no good idea

source: https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/issues/317

If a wiki was available I could update procedures because on the website many procedure are obsoletes.

When we add a business rule, on Actions we can assign "Very high", 'high'... priority but we cannot assign the "Major" priority

Most organization use some form of Web application such as OWA, WordPress, Joomla or GLPI.

The Web applications plugin allows tickets to be associated with the web application.

The last few releases for the Web applications plugin fail to support association of ticket which is the most required feature of the plugin.

Integrating the Web applications plugin would allow myself and others to upgrade to the current version of GLPI rather than being held back.

I'm suggesting the fact that GLPI could keep track of the significant events a Computer/Phone/NetworkEquipment/Printer/Room/etc suffered or gained of. The goal is to offer a clear view of what happened to it.

Examples:

For a computer:

* Computer was acquired

* OS was installed

* Faulty RAM was replaced

* HDD was "upgraded" for a SSD

* OS was reinstalled

For a Network equipment:

* Switch was acquired

* Faulty fan was replaced

* Firmware was upgraded

I must admit the initial need that made me think about this feature is for computers. Because they are pieces of hardware that "lives" the most and are what users are the more sensible to (it's what they use everyday and it's shape determine their mood/user experience), I need a digest of bad and good things that were done to it, so that I can determine if the whole computer should be replaced or if a OS re-installation could improve the user experience.

Implementation could rely on tickets with a simple "Significant event?" checkbox.

The "x was acquired" event could use financial and administrative informations from the "Management" tab.

Theses events shall be listed on a dedicated "Significant event" tab ordered by date.

I'm not sure the need is strong enough for a core integration so it'll be a plugin.

I have a business rule that assign a technician group by category, for add and update. The group is added but i want change it.

Thanks in advance.

Hello,

Is it possible to add the endpoints responsible for linking a Component to a given Asset?

For example; I want to create an item based on a DeviceHardDrive Component (with an ID of 2) for an Asset (a Computer with the ID 100). With the legacy API I can do the following:

https://{{GLPI}}/apirest.php/Computer/:computerId/Item_DeviceHardDrive/

With the corresponding payload:

{
    "input": [
        {
            "items_id": 100,
            "itemtype": "Computer",
            "deviceharddrives_id": 2,
            "capacity": 9314000,
            "serial": "abc123",
            "entities_id": 0,
            "busID": "1",
            "otherserial": "otherSerial_def456",
            "locations_id": 1,
            "states_id": 60
        }
    ]
}

This will create an item DeviceHardDrive which will be linked to Computer 100.

After searching a while in the SwaggerUI of the High Level API, I didn't find an endpoint which describes the following behavior.

So I started to make web search, to confirm if I'm simply blind and that I didn't see the endpoint(s) that I was searching for.

I found this topic that clearly says that this behavior is not currently available but, that we have to follow the changelogs until it appears:

https://forum.glpi-project.org/viewtopic.php?id=293852

Then I searched on the official GitHub repository of GLPI if a PR is on progress (or if an issue exists) for this feature but, I didn't find one (I was filtering with the label api though) so, that's the reason why I am posting this feature request.