It is not clear why we have three different user/group entities attached to projects/tasks.

Would it not be better to allow users and groups to be added to the Project Team and allow the following Project roles to be assigned to users in the project team Project Manager, Project Sponsor,  Project Team Member (default).

Tasks ownership should only be able to be assigned to a user in the Project Team.

sub-project team membership and roles should only be able to be assigned to members of the parent project team.

Currently Kanban splits tasks/projects into columns for task/project status, it would make project management simpler if it were also possible to switch to each of the following views.

Put tasks/projects into separate Kanban columns for each project/task user/owner

Put tasks/projects into separate Kanban columns for each project/task group

This would allow simple reassignment of task to different users/groups by drag and drop.

Hi, i search how can i synchronize contacts from the crm dolibarr to glpi.

I found a plugin in the glpi market  "glpi to dolibarr" but it's not what i'm looking for. Someone have an idea about to help me please??? Thanks

We would like for users to be able to register for access where they would create their own username and password. For 10 version, this gonna be a feature of GLPI?

User story: making our first steps with the planning, we had all "event types" checked. Thus, we struggled at understanding why the tasks we actually planned were still not shown. To make our tasks appear, we had to untick one of the checkboxes, which is a surprising behavior.

Procedure : Go to Home / Assistance / Planning, and check all boxes in the "events type" panel

Expected results : all events are shown on the calendar.

Actual results : the events we were looking for are hidden, despite their boxes beeing checked.

Suggested enhancement :

- use a single behavior for all items in the event type list (ie, events should be shown when the boxes are checked, and hidden when the boxes are empty)

- remove the "only background events" filter, and replace it with a "background events" filter

norte se ejecutan las reglas, he creado 1 regla que debe asignar a un grupo cuando la categoría tenga una palabra en especifico pero no sirve.

It would be nice to be able to link problems to not only individual items but also device models. That way you can keep track of problems impacting an entire category of items without needing to individually link and unlink all the items.

It would be nice to have a button in the "Follow-ups" and "Solutions" that you place at the end of the text typed in the text field.

A suggestion would be:

1) The technician types the text in the field;

2) Press a button on the screen;

3) At the end of the typed text, the name of the logged in technician is added.

If we could define some more text on the button (besides the name), it would be nice too :)

I-DoIT is a software like GLPI. However, the development of GLPI is progressing much better than I-DoIT and I am considering switching. But then I don't want to start from scratch with my inventory.

I managed to upload a file using api rest, but I couldn't find a way to link it to a followup.

I don't know if it is missing, or I miss it in documentation. I tried to register the forum to ask there, but I couldn't (my 2 address are identified as spam); and I didn't receive an answer to my mails asking for help with my account.