Welcome to GLPi feature request service.
Please check if the feature has not already been requested.
If not, please describe it

+13

Create a ticket from a problem

tyrone wyatt 9 years ago updated 9 years ago 0

The option to create a problem from a ticket already exists.

The option to create a change from a problem already exists.

But no option to create a ticket from a problem.


Create a ticket from a problem would be very useful feature when logging repeat tickets of the same problem.


An example would be that the internet is down for all users, the hotliner or technician would need to follow complete the process to log new tickets:

Current process: Create a new ticket manually by entering the requester, category, title, description, submit and adding the ticket to the problem.

New process: Click click create a ticket from problem, enter requester and submit.


I have used the option in another service desk package in the past and this feature is a real time saver. This feature encourages all tickets to be logged by service desk operators and technicians.


A mock up of Create a ticket from a problem.

Image 37


+12

Include the name field from the received emails of non-existent users on GLPI

Demetris Demetriou 3 years ago updated by Random488 2 years ago 2

If it's possible, it'll be helpfull to include the complete email form (Name-Surname<username@email..>) or just the NameSurname part into the received tickets for non-existent GLPI users

+12

Move assets from one category to another

Bahadir Birden 4 years ago 0

Hi ,

I'm just getting acquainted with the GLPi world. I have digged documents about my problem but couldn't find .

World is more the Computer asset. Servers, Virtual servers lots of types. I can created those asset types by generic object plugin.


But is it possible to Move an asset from Computer type to (Custom Created) Servers type.


Best Regards

Bahadir

+12
Under review

picture for hardware

Yannick 8 years ago updated by Curtis Conard 2 years ago 5

Hello

It would be useful to add a picture associated with model and display it in computers / network / device / phones

A new setup / pictures / 

Add a new picture

Select model associated


Image 106


+12

Mark fields as mandatory

Johan Cwiklinski 8 years ago updated by asdf 6 years ago 5

We can define unicity on some fields, but their value can still be empty.


On another hand, we may want to set some fields as mandatory; but without any unicity.


Maybe could we consider upgrading the unicity feature to a more generic "fields setup", with unicity and mantadory (at least). Such fields must be marke as required on the html side (using the "standard" * mark, and the relevant html attribute.

+12

Add more questions to survey

Ricardo Alexander Perez Ricard 8 years ago updated by Yannick 8 years ago 3

Improbe surveys with more questions about of services, etc.

+12

Language by Entity - Define language by entity with more relevant is user language, second is Entity and the last is GLPI Default Language

Gambware 8 years ago 0

Language by Entity - Define language by entity with more relevant is user language, second is Entity and the last is GLPI Default Language


This will be helpfull for who use GLPI with Anonymous Ticket. When tickets came from specific e-mail address the rule move to specific Entity so the e-mails notifications will be sent following the language of the entity and not from GLPI Default language.


+12

Template for Problems

Albert 9 years ago updated by Curtis Conard 2 years ago 3

Firstly, thank you for this amazing application.


Please add a template option for 'Problems'. It would be so helpful.

+12
Under review

Sync agenda, tasks, dates with Google Calendar

Juan Fernando Villa Hernández 9 years ago updated by Becky Jones 4 years ago 3

Enable the possibility to sync the dates in the diferent options with google calendar.

+11

Contracts: Allow fine picking of end date

Mathieu MD 2 years ago 0

There is no way to specify a contract End Date to a given day. You set a Start Date and pick a number of months in Initial contract period, then the End Date is computed. But we have some contracts that doesn't matches this algorithm.

I think that implementing one of these options would enhance Contracts management:

  • adding a dedicated End Date field
    • (which could be prefilled by JS according to Initial contract period, so that user experience would not change); or
  • allowing to pick a Initial contract period in days instead of only in months.